Chip Condition is graded on the physical condition of chip. The condition of the chip depends on the quality of manufacturing and the chip’s wear and tear. The Common Chip Grading Methodology (CCGM) provides for a 100 point scale, not dissimilar to coin grading. However, to attempt to reduce judgment variations, scores for individual components are awarded on a 10 point scale. The general rule for grading is that a 10 is perfection, a 0 is scrap, and significant distractions are a 5. All scores are not equal. Lower scores are weighted heavier because of the impact to the visual appeal of the chip.
Condition Score | |
Scale | Condition |
10 | Perfect/Flawless |
9 | Flaw not visible on casual inspection |
7 | Minor Detraction |
5 | Significant Detraction |
2 | Major Detraction |
0 | Scrap |
Following the process outlined below, a chip is ultimately assigned a Chip Grade (CG). Terminology for grades is outlined below:
Chip Grades |
||
Mint | CG-98+ | |
Near Mint | CG-90 | |
Excellent | CG-80 | |
Fine | CG-70 | |
Good | CG-60 | |
Fair | CG-50 | |
Poor | CG-25 |
Common Chip Grading Methodology – CCGM
This CCGM was developed to give chip collectors a common terminology to describe the condition of chips. As with any human analysis judgment, opinion, and bias will always cause variability. The CCGM process provides guidance to commonly express the condition of chips. The process has been simplified as much as possible, but still provides weight to those factors that give the strongest impressions of a chip.
The CCGM Process
For the chip, complete the appropriate CCGM grading matrix. For chips that have metal surfaces other than the leads then choose the Metal Surface Matrix, otherwise choose Non-Metal Surface Matrix. Score each of the Component Factors, according to the Condition Grading Guidelines table. Weights are established by the score given:
Score Weight |
|
Score | Weight |
10 | 1 |
9 | 1 |
8 | 2 |
7 | 3 |
6 | 5 |
5 | 7 |
4 | 11 |
3 | 17 |
2 | 25 |
1 | 38 |
0 | 57 |
In addition to weight in the table an Impact Weight must be applied. Impact Weight attempts to account for in the visual and psychological impact of various defects.
Impact Weight |
|
Factor | Weight |
Coloration | 1 |
Alignment and Centering | 1 |
Manufacturing Defects | 2 |
Edges Sharp and Clear | 2 |
Print Coloration | 4 |
Scuffs/Scraps | 4 |
Chips or Cracks | 8 |
Dents, Cracks, Corrosion | 8 |
Creases, Cracks, Corrosion | 8 |
Print Irregularities | 8 |
Multiply the Score by the Score Weight and Impact Weight to determine each Weighted Score. Add all of the Weighted Scores to determine the Total Weighted Score. To determine the Chip Grade, divide the Total Weighted Score by the sum of the weights in Weight column.
This matrix is used for ceramic or plastic chips with metal surfaces, such as lids, other than leads.
CCGM Grading Matrix (Metal Surface )
|
||||
Component | Factors | Score | Weight | Weighted Score |
Ceramic/Plastic Package Surfaces | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scratches | ||||
Chips or Cracks | ||||
Metal Surfaces | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scratches | ||||
Dents, Cracks, Corrosion | ||||
Leads | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scratches | ||||
Creases, Cracks, Corrosion | ||||
Printing | Alignment and Centering | |||
Edges Sharp and Clear | ||||
Print Coloration | ||||
Print Irregularities | ||||
Total Weighted Score | ||||
Chip Grade =Total Weighted Score / Sum of Weights |
Download a spreadsheet to calculate Chip Grades for Metal Surface Chips
This matrix is used for ceramic or plastic chips with no metal surfaces other than leads.
CCGM Grading Matrix (Non-Metal Surface )
|
||||
Component | Factors | Score | Weight | Weighted Score |
Ceramic/Plastic Package Surfaces | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scratches | ||||
Chips or Cracks | ||||
Leads | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scratches | ||||
Creases, Cracks, Corrosion | ||||
Printing | Alignment and Centering | |||
Edges Sharp and Clear | ||||
Print Coloration | ||||
Print Irregularities | ||||
Total Weighted Score | ||||
Chip Grade =Total Weighted Score / Sum of Weights |
Download a spreadsheet to calculate Chip Grades for Non-Metal Surface Chips
This matrix is used for chips with all metal surfaces.
CCGM Grading Matrix (All Metal Surface )
|
||||
Component | Factors | Score | Weight | Weighted Score |
Metal Package Surfaces | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scraps | ||||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Chips or Cracks | ||||
Leads | Coloration | |||
Manufacturing Defects | ||||
Scuffs/Scratches | ||||
Creases, Cracks, Corrosion | ||||
Printing | Alignment and Centering | |||
Edges Sharp and Clear | ||||
Print Coloration | ||||
Print Irregularities | ||||
Total Weighted Score | ||||
Chip Grade =Total Weighted Score / Sum of Weights |
Download a spreadsheet to calculate Chip Grades for All Metal Surface Chips
Generally the displayed surface of a chip is most important and “dark” side imperfections are graded 1/2 the value of a “display” side flaw.
Condition Grading Guidelines
|
||||
Component | Condition |
10 |
5 |
0 |
Ceramic/ Plastic Surfaces | Coloration: the uniformity of the color of the surface, age fading, or chemically caused discolored areas of the package | Uniform bright | Noticeable and distracting discontinuities or blotches | Fading, mottling, blotches cover most of the surface and are the distracting focus of attention |
Manufacturing defects: proper alignment and form | None, no casting or machining defects | Noticeable and distracting alignment or deformities | Operation of the chip would be questioned | |
Scuffs/Scraps: damage caused by contact with | None | Noticeable and distracting surface abrasions | Scuff/Scraps are the distracting focus of attention | |
Chips or Cracks: surface broken and/or missing | None | Noticeable and distracting surface abrasions | Operation of the chip would be questioned | |
Metal Surfaces | Coloration: the uniformity of the color of the surface, age fading, or chemically caused discolored areas of the package | Uniform bright | Noticeable and distracting discontinuities or blotches | Fading, mottling, blotches cover most of the surface and are the distracting focus of attention |
Manufacturing defects: proper alignment and form | None, no casting or machining defects | Noticeable and distracting alignment or deformities | Operation of the chip would be questioned | |
Scuffs, Scratches: buffed areas of a matte finish, thin shallow cuts | No Scuffs, minor hairline scratches | Noticeable and distracting scuffs and scratches in normal light | Scuffs and scratches are the focus of attention | |
Dents, Chips, Cracks, Corrosion: surface broken, corrupted and/or missing | None | Noticeable and distracting surface abrasions | Operation of the chip would be questioned | |
Leads | Coloration: the uniformity of the color of the surface, age fading, or chemically caused discolored areas of the package | None | Noticeable and distracting discontinuities or botches on some leads | Blotches over most leads and are the distracting focus of attention |
Manufacturing defects: proper alignment and form | None, leads have crisp machined edges | Noticeable and distracting alignment or deformities | Operation of the chip would be questioned | |
Scuffs, Scratches: buffed areas of a matte finish, thin shallow cuts | None | Noticeable and distracting botches on some leads | Scuffs and scratches over most leads and are the distracting focus of attention | |
Creases, Cracks, Corrosion: creases causes by bent leads, leads broken, corrupted and/or missing | None, leads are straight and uniform | Noticeable and distracting lead abrasions on some leads | Lead abrasions on most leads, chip operation questionable | |
Printing | Alignment and Centering | Well centered and aligned | Noticeable and distracting centering or alignment | Extreme centering and alignment error, some printing missing, illegible |
Edges Sharp and Clear | Clear well defined edges | Noticeable and distracting irregular edges or blurring | Faded and mottled, illegible | |
Print Coloration: the uniformity of the print color | Uniform bright | Noticeable and distracting discontinuities | Faded and mottled, illegible | |
Print Irregularities | Characters complete, no damage | Noticeable and distracting sections missing | Characters mostly missing, illegible |